Oct 02, 2019 · Famous anthropologist John Peabody Harrington, whose work focused on native peoples of California, started research with her family in 1913 and continued with three generations for nearly 50 years. This inspired Ernestine's mother to begin taking notes and, combined with mission records (which survived intact from the late 1700s), they form the ... The NAGPRA Review Committee therefore decided to not review the case since the materials had been returned. No precedent has been set on the matter of documents being repatriated. What does any of this mean to you? NAGPRA legislation is not taught in library and archive settings. I would hazard that most archivists have not even heard of NAGPRA.
Jul 29, 2017 · In 1990, after campaigns and legislative changes within individual states, Congress passed the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), which enabled Native Americans to seek the return not only of human remains but also of artefacts associated with burials, or of otherwise sacred significance. Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law Native American Church. The Native American Church of Jesus Christ is a spiritual movement that integrates the teachings of Christian life with the spiritual and ethical traditions of various Native cultures. A central component of the Native American Church is the sacramental ingestion of peyote during peyote meetings.
Mar 25, 2014 · With the implementation of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) in the US, federal museums are required to repatriate any Native American skeletal remains, grave goods and sacred objects to their rightful tribes. Jun 25, 2018 · The real title of the case is: Her Majesty The Queen vs. Tom Dudley and Edwin Stephens. And it is a criminal case that shook the English society of its day, and still plays with people’s minds today because it deals with the harshest aspects of life and death: survival. The Dudley and Stephens case was decided in 1884 in a very Victorian ... Includes claims concerning U.S. cultural property said to be owned in violation of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) and of laws governing archaeological objects found on federal land. IV. Art Theft (Other than World War II and Cultural Property Looting) Includes civil and criminal cases of theft and replevin. V.
The famous case of Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) AC 562 (the ‘snail in the bottle’ case) is a very important one in relation to the development of the law of negligence. Provide a summary of the facts and the decision of the court in Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) AC 562. View keyboard shortcuts. EditViewInsertFormatToolsTable. 12pt. Paragraph
Excerpt from: Osage Nation NAGPRA Claim for Human Remains Removed from the Clarksville Mound Group (23PI6), Pike County, Missouri by Andrea A. Hunter, James Munkres, and Barker Fariss, Osage Nation Historic Preservation Office, Pawhuska, OK (2013) pp. 1-60. Ancestral Osage Geography. by Dr. Andrea A. Hunter. The following summary of Osage and ancestral Osage geography is derived from ...The claims in both cases fall under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990, widely known as NAGPRA, which established a process for museums and federal agencies to return certain cultural items to lineal descendants, culturally affiliated Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations.